首页> 外文OA文献 >Epidemiological time series studies of PM2.5 and daily mortality and hospital admissions:a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Epidemiological time series studies of PM2.5 and daily mortality and hospital admissions:a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:PM2.5流行病学时间序列研究,每日死亡率和住院人数:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundShort-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter (particles with a median aerodynamic diameter <2.5 μm (PM2.5)) air pollution has been associated with adverse health effects. Existing literature reviews have been limited in size and scope.Methods We conducted a comprehensive, systematic review and meta-analysis of 110 peer-reviewed time series studies indexed in medical databases to May 2011to assess the evidence for associations between PM2.5 and daily mortality and hospital admissions for a range of diseases and ages. We stratified our analyses by geographical region to determine the consistency of the evidence worldwide and investigated small study bias.Results Based upon 23 estimates for all-cause mortality, a 10 ug/m3 increment in PM2.5 was associated with a 1.04% (95% CI 0.52% to 1.56%) increase in the risk of death. Worldwide, there was substantial regional variation (0.25% to 2.08%). Associations for respiratory causes of death were larger than for cardiovascular causes, 1.51% (1.01% to 2.01%) vs 0.84% (0.41% to 1.28%). Positive associations with mortality for most other causes of death and for cardiovascular and respiratory hospital admissions were also observed. We found evidence for small study bias in single-city mortality studies and in multicity studies of cardiovascular disease.Conclusions The consistency of the evidence for adverse health effects of short-term exposure to PM2.5 across a range of important health outcomes and diseases supports policy measures to control PM2.5 concentrations. However, reasons for heterogeneity in effect estimates in different regions of the world require further investigation. Small study bias should also be considered in assessing and quantifying health risks from PM2.5.
机译:背景短期暴露于室外细颗粒物(空气动力学直径中值<2.5μm(PM2.5)的颗粒)空气污染已对健康产生不利影响。现有文献综述的规模和范围均受到限制。方法我们对截至2011年5月在医学数据库中建立索引的110篇经同行评审的时间序列研究进行了全面,系统的综述和荟萃分析,以评估PM2.5与每日死亡率之间的关联性证据。以及各种疾病和年龄的住院治疗。我们按地理区域对我们的分析进行分层,以确定全球证据的一致性,并调查了较小的研究偏见。结果基于23种全因死亡率的估计,PM2.5每增加10 ug / m3的人与1.04%(95死亡风险增加%CI(0.52%至1.56%)。在全球范围内,区域差异很大(0.25%至2.08%)。呼吸系统死亡原因的关联性大于心血管原因,分别为1.51%(1.01%至2.01%)和0.84%(0.41%至1.28%)。还观察到与其他大多数死亡原因以及心血管和呼吸道住院患者的死亡率呈正相关。我们在单城市死亡率研究和多城市心血管疾病研究中发现了较小的研究偏倚证据。结论在一系列重要的健康结局和疾病中,短期暴露于PM2.5对不良健康影响的证据的一致性支持控制PM2.5浓度的政策措施。但是,在世界不同地区的效果估计中存在异质性的原因需要进一步研究。在评估和量化PM2.5对健康的危害时,还应考虑较小的研究偏倚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号